https://whatwg.org/working-mode#changes is not as clear as it could be that major changes are best not announced and committed to master within a day or so. Some time should pass for review and appeal to ensure the broadest possible buy-in while still moving relatively quickly.
Maybe a third bullet point could be added to the second list saying something to the effect of:
For major changes enough time should have passed for review and appeal by the larger community. Generally a full week is considered sufficient.
(Generally I measure this from the time an issue or PR is opened to the time where the PR could land on master.)
Nit, I'd put this in the first list, as the second list is about mechanical criteria. Probably right after "It should have been reviewed by one or more members of the community."
https://whatwg.org/working-mode#changes is not as clear as it could be that major changes are best not announced and committed to master within a day or so. Some time should pass for review and appeal to ensure the broadest possible buy-in while still moving relatively quickly.
Maybe a third bullet point could be added to the second list saying something to the effect of:
(Generally I measure this from the time an issue or PR is opened to the time where the PR could land on master.)