Open annevk opened 2 years ago
Review Draft publication goes relatively well (though see #348) as per https://github.com/whatwg/meta/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md#review-drafts. One problem is recovering from build failures.
When hitting a build failure my current process is something like this:
review.sh
git checkout main
chmod 755 review.sh
Step 1 is always needed. Ideally step 2 through 7 would be replaced by a single step, e.g., ./review.sh redo.
./review.sh redo
Anyone else have thoughts on this?
Review Draft publication goes relatively well (though see #348) as per https://github.com/whatwg/meta/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md#review-drafts. One problem is recovering from build failures.
When hitting a build failure my current process is something like this:
review.sh
script by commenting out four lines (starting withgit checkout main
) to avoid it creating a new branch.review.sh
executable viachmod 755 review.sh
(755 is prolly too much?).Step 1 is always needed. Ideally step 2 through 7 would be replaced by a single step, e.g.,
./review.sh redo
.Anyone else have thoughts on this?