Open hypaik opened 4 months ago
Can you give more info on the error? I dont think diploid assumption should make any difference until the last step which is the estimation of ambient rna which is after clustering and doublet detection.
Thank you for your prompt response.
Here is the head of error messages FYI, GRCh38_cellRanger.fa is a reference genome file I used. In addition, the same ref file has no problem with other souporcell running. Moreover, with out souporcell, *h5d file of this sample showed low doublet rate via Scrubelt.
" [proj_xxx]$ head souporcell_K2RPLEndo1.err /xxx/proj_Termination/GRCh38_cellRanger.fa: line 1: 1: command not found /blues/ngs/data/proj_Termination/GRCh38_cellRanger.fa: line 2: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN: command not found /xxxa/proj_Termination/GRCh38_cellRanger.fa: line 3: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN: command not found /xxx/proj_Termination/GRCh38_cellRanger.fa: line 4: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN: command not found...."
What step is this coming from? Like souporcell outputs .err files for each step. Which file is this? This is pretty weird like the fasta is being treated as an executable…
Thank you for your fast response. I figured out something wrong happened in the bash shell script of mine. I used a SLURM-base system of my institute. It makes this weird thing... Now I fixed this bug :-). However I still curious why diploidy assumption do not impact the results. Can I send an independent e-mail you for this issue? I found that your affiliation was changed based on Google Scholar.
Sure, just updated my email on google scholar. You can find me at whheaton@gmail.com or haynesheaton@auburn.edu
But the short answer is lets look at the steps.
Dear Heaton
Thank you for the development for this nice tool. I've been totally enjoyed to analyze my samples with Souporcell. However, recently, I've got very unique sample. It is embryo cells in very early stage with aneuploidy of autosomal chromosome. When I tried to run souporcell (it is mixed sample with fetus and maternal cell), the Souporcell spits out error signal then there is no result for clustering at all. Based on the published paper of sourporcell (Nat. Method, 2020), I guess it is an issue of diploidy assumption. I you can share your bioinformatic insight for this issue let me know. Thank you.