Oryx: Bizagi objects are disconnected from the rest, put at the bottom and without label

whitehathackers / apromore

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/apromore

0 stars 0 forks source link

Oryx: Bizagi objects are disconnected from the rest, put at the bottom and without label #82

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Check if this is a problem in the XPDL or in Oryx. If the latter, fix it.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by marcello...@gmail.com on 12 Aug 2010 at 2:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

this is both problem of processes in the repository and oryx. some processes in 
repository dont have the "AssociationDirection" in their "Associations"'s 
attributes. there where a problem in oryx side as well that is fixed now. (this 
attribute was named "Direction" instead of "AssociationDirection" in the json 
representing the XPDL process) 

Dataobjects are now connected to tasks but we have a problem for Bizage models 
that need auto-layout. auto-layout is not working well with objects connected 
to tasks. it still keeps objects at the bottom of the page. this leads to some 
lines crossing over other objects in order to reach the other side of the 
association they belong to.

Original comment by mehrad1@gmail.com on 12 Nov 2010 at 6:09

Changed state: Fixed

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I have played a bit with this new feature with the model id 1 on winbox. There 
are still 2 issues with this:
1) the name of the data objects doesn't show up
2) after saving it (see version 0.2) all association arcs and message arcs 
become disconnected.

Original comment by marcello...@gmail.com on 12 Nov 2010 at 8:17

Changed state: Accepted

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

oryx doesnt reads back name of dataobjects. you can try it with online oryx.

Original comment by mehrad1@gmail.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 11:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Please report these two issues in the Oryx google code issue tracker. Both 
issues seem to be easy to fix. You can attempt it next week.

Original comment by marcello...@gmail.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 9:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Issue 79 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by marcello...@gmail.com on 16 Nov 2010 at 9:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Check model 113 on winbox. There the data objects do preserve their label when 
opening the model again.

Original comment by marcello...@gmail.com on 18 Nov 2010 at 11:16