Closed stepps00 closed 3 years ago
Yes please!
Does this mean we have geometries for all of these now? If so they would make good candidates for a subsequent blog post about the go-whosonsfirst-spatial
PIP stuff.
Does this mean we have geometries for all of these now?
Yep, the work we've done includes:
wof:megacity
property setwof:megacity
property, but needed one (based on the NE populated places file)I tried to use parent geometries (mostly meso
) to construct new locality polygons, but some were digitized by hand.
Nice. I am considering adding very basic query functionality to the go-whosonfirst-index
package(s). Something along the lines of:
https://github.com/aaronland/go-smithsonian-openaccess#inline-queries
That, when exposed via the CLI properties to the go-whosonfirst-dist
packages would allow you to build SQLite distributions, for example, with spatial indexes for all the megacities across (n) repos.
That's as far as I've gotten with the idea though...
That, when exposed via the CLI properties to the go-whosonfirst-dist packages would allow you to build SQLite distributions, for example, with spatial indexes for all the megacities across (n) repos.
Very cool.. sounds like this could be used to create per-placetype dist files? All neighbourhoods, counties, etc?
Now that you mention it, yes. That would make what you're describing possible.
Just following up here.. I've got a draft blog post locally. I'll likely push to a branch this weekend.
https://github.com/whosonfirst-data/whosonfirst-data/issues/1547
This issue was recently completed.. it would be a good candidate for a blog post.