Closed PatrickAlphaC closed 2 years ago
It is already supported, see : https://github.com/wighawag/hardhat-deploy/issues/146#issuecomment-1003045997
But I could copy the openzeppelin implementation in hardhat-deploy source if that is what you mean ?
Gotcha, thanks!
No I think this is probably better. Make sure people who want to use UUPS know what they are doing.
There are 2 main openzeppelin proxies, but one currently supported out of the box:
You can find the differences here.
It would be great to support UUPS out of the box as well... I know this would be a little harder.