Open adi274 opened 1 year ago
Unfortunately support for companion network is not very good. it is a feature that should be supported at a lower level in hardhat itself.
I am even considering removing it completely from hardhat-deploy
@adi274 Are you sure your "chiado" and "goerli" networks are properly defined with a working endpoint? I Have been using multiple companion networks without issue here. @wighawag Please do not remove the feature until there is an equivalent support in hardhat :)
Is the feature currently supported? I get errors Error HH101
my hardhat config looks something like this
networks: {
hardhat: {
mining: {
auto: false,
interval: 10000,
},
},
skale: {
url: process.env.RPC_URL || "",
accounts: { mnemonic: process.env.MNEMONIC || "test test test test test test test test test test test test" },
chainId: 134534534,
timeout: 300000,
},
mumbai: {
url: process.env.RPC_URL || "",
accounts: [process.env.DEPLOYER_KEY || ""],
chainId: 80001,
timeout: 300000,
deploy: ["destination-deploy/"],
companionNetworks: { nativeChain: "skale" },
},
},
and my deploy script is as follows:
const { deployments, getNamedAccounts } = hre;
const { deploy, get } = deployments;
const { deployer } = await getNamedAccounts();
const adminAddress = NATIVE_ADMIN;
console.log("Deploying polygonM");
await deploy("polygonM", {
from: deployer,
log: true,
autoMine: true, // speed up deployment on local network (ganache, hardhat), no effect on live networks
args: [adminAddress],
});
const polygonM = await get("polygonM");
console.log(Contract Deployed Successfully {"polygonM" : "${polygonM.address}"});
const skaleM = await hre.companionNetworks["nativeChain"].deployments.get("skaleM");
console.log(hre.companionNetworks["nativeChain"], getNamedAccounts, bridgeContract);
does not seem to work atm, always throws error Error HH101: Hardhat was set to use chain id 134534534, but connected to a chain with id 80001
how do I connect to each respective chainId? @wighawag cc @nataouze since its worked for you, I am using a single companionNetwork
It looks like you are using the same node url for both networks which could not work.
On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 14:51, Yohan Nelson @.***> wrote:
Is the feature currently supported? I get errors Error HH101 my hardhat config looks something like this networks: { hardhat: { mining: { auto: false, interval: 10000, }, }, skale: { url: process.env.RPC_URL || "", accounts: { mnemonic: process.env.MNEMONIC || "test test test test test test test test test test test test" }, chainId: 134534534, timeout: 300000, }, mumbai: { url: process.env.RPC_URL || "", accounts: [process.env.DEPLOYER_KEY || ""], chainId: 80001, timeout: 300000, deploy: ["destination-deploy/"], companionNetworks: { nativeChain: "skale" }, }, },
and my deploy script is as follows:
`const { deployments, getNamedAccounts } = hre; const { deploy, get } = deployments; const { deployer } = await getNamedAccounts(); const adminAddress = NATIVE_ADMIN;
console.log("Deploying polygonM"); await deploy("polygonM", { from: deployer, log: true, autoMine: true, // speed up deployment on local network (ganache, hardhat), no effect on live networks args: [adminAddress], });
const polygonM = await get("polygonM");
console.log(Contract Deployed Successfully {"polygonM" : "${polygonM.address}"});
const skaleM = await hre.companionNetworks["nativeChain"].deployments.get("skaleM");
console.log(hre.companionNetworks["nativeChain"], getNamedAccounts, bridgeContract);`
does not seem to work atm, always throws error Error HH101: Hardhat was set to use chain id 134534534, but connected to a chain with id 80001 how do I connect to each respective chainId? @wighawag https://github.com/wighawag
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/wighawag/hardhat-deploy/issues/416#issuecomment-1447621355, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD7SSCMR2T5AIS24FTM5VIDWZWG4PANCNFSM6AAAAAAUL7NSCQ . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
correct, figured this out forgot to update here. Thank you! @nataouze its resolved.
I want to deploy a pair of contracts on multiple L1-L2 networks, and for that I was using
companionNetworks
but when I am trying to define more than one companion network for a network, it reverts withHere is the code snippet from the hardhat config:
There should be a way to handle multiple companionNetworks for a network.