search

willfaught / paige

Powerful, pliable pixel perfection. An advanced Hugo theme.
https://willfaught.com/paige
MIT License
232 stars 50 forks source link

Any plan to support photoswipe? #19

Closed mobilelifeful closed 1 year ago

mobilelifeful commented 1 year ago

Thank you for sharing this theme with a lot features. Wonder if you plan to support https://github.com/dimsemenov/photoswipe ? Thank you.

willfaught commented 1 year ago

Which feature(s) specifically do you need? A lightbox? A masonry layout?

mobilelifeful commented 1 year ago

Thank you for sharing this theme with a lot features. Wonder if you plan to support https://github.com/dimsemenov/photoswipe ? Thank you.

Not sure if this features is lightbox or A masonry layout

from https://www.liwen.id.au/heg/

would like to able able to demonstrate like the blog above with picture, when visitors click on them to show a bigger one.

willfaught commented 1 year ago

The gallery shortcode currently links to the full images. If you click an image, the full size will be shown. Is that sufficient for your needs?

mobilelifeful commented 1 year ago

The gallery shortcode currently links to the full images. If you click an image, the full size will be shown. Is that sufficient for your needs?

Thank you for the quick response. test out again from https://willfaught.com/paige/shortcodes/gallery/ When people click on the image of https://willfaught.com/paige/shortcodes/gallery/1-2.jpg (embedded version of it) it does show full size of it, which leads average non-tech "lost", and it doesn't seem to bring a "hd" version of the same image.

ps: it does bring a hd version of the image, please support these:

  1. mouse over the image, it show that the image can be view in HD, like a + icon,
  2. double click, when the image is shown in "full view", close "full view" go back to the page.
willfaught commented 1 year ago

I want to make sure I understand. Also, I think I might have not been clear enough.

If you go to the "Images parameter" section at https://willfaught.com/paige/shortcodes/gallery/#images-parameter, then click the three images in that section, the browser will navigate to the image alone, where it can be shown at the full size.

Are you saying that non-technical people would be lost doing that? If so, I don't understand why, since users can use the back button to navigate back to the gallery.

Can you explain what you mean by HD version? Do you mean displaying the full size of the image, as much as possible?

mobilelifeful commented 1 year ago

I want to make sure I understand. Also, I think I might have not been clear enough.

If you go to the "Images parameter" section at https://willfaught.com/paige/shortcodes/gallery/#images-parameter, then click the three images in that section, the browser will navigate to the image alone, where it can be shown at the full size.

Are you saying that non-technical people would be lost doing that? If so, I don't understand why, since users can use the back button to navigate back to the gallery.

Can you explain what you mean by HD version? Do you mean displaying the full size of the image, as much as possible?

Yes, I believe non-technical people would be "lost",
first, they may never understand/think that the image can be click on, which lost some data/point of sharing the image. second, once they are in the new tab with the full size of image without any nav for them, some of they will close current tab.

It's a UX thing, when mouse over an image or finger over an image, an enlarge icon / hand sign will guide them to see the full size picture, then in the full size picture mode, a return arrow or a close sign will guide them back to continue the reading.

Screen Shot 2023-04-05 at 1 56 08 AM image

HD, trying to mean high Resolution Images

willfaught commented 1 year ago

first, they may never understand/think that the image can be click on, which lost some data/point of sharing the image.

Earlier, you wrote: "mouse over the image, it show that the image can be view in HD, like a + icon." It seems that this approach would have the same problem: the user has to hover over the image. Currently, if you hover over the gallery images, your mouse's pointer will change to a hand, indicating it's clickable (although only if you use the images parameter). If the user knows how browsers work, then wouldn't they understand what this means, and how to navigate backward after finishing with the image?

second, once they are in the new tab with the full size of image without any nav for them, some of they will close current tab.

By default, it navigates to the image in the same tab. But they also have the option to open the link in a new tab. If they use the same tab, they will have the browser's toolbar, so they can click the back button. I don't see how this might be confusing. It would only be confusing if navigation with browsers in general is confusing, it seems to me.

willfaught commented 1 year ago

There hasn't been a response, so closing.