lafirest
commented
10 months ago Hey, thanks, this is really cool! I've been wanting to integrate expeditor. I would like one change, though, which is that I want it to be an option, not the only behavior. IE can you change this so that there is still a command line flag for the old behavior? I'm happy for expeditor to be the default, but I still want readline-lib and the raw input with neither editor to be available. … On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:24:06PM -0800, lafirest wrote: You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: #98 -- Commit Summary -- * feat: integrate Expeditor to instead of the readline -- File Changes -- M rash/info.rkt (7) M rash/private/rashrc-lib.rkt (10) M rash/repl.rkt (107) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/willghatch/racket-rash/pull/98.patch https://github.com/willghatch/racket-rash/pull/98.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #98 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: @.***>
thank for your reply, you are right, the Expeditor also need some patch for a better experience, thus currently this should be a option
Hey, thanks, this is really cool! I've been wanting to integrate expeditor.
I would like one change, though, which is that I want it to be an option, not the only behavior. IE can you change this so that there is still a command line flag for the old behavior? I'm happy for expeditor to be the default, but I still want readline-lib and the raw input with neither editor to be available.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:24:06PM -0800, lafirest wrote: