williamleonard / obblm

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/obblm
1 stars 0 forks source link

Statistical graphics for individual matches #257

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Statistical graphics for individual matches which compare the stats of the
match/team achievements to monthly averages and (maybe?) monthly best/most
(from mem. matches) / all time most (maybe not)?

Please comment...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Nimda...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2009 at 11:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2009 at 11:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
... maybe couple it with the new extra player stats table used by botocs?

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 23 Sep 2009 at 11:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The extra player stats are still a ways off.

Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com on 24 Sep 2009 at 2:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 19 Oct 2009 at 2:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 21 Oct 2009 at 11:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Necrosis has made a ton of stats and this may not be too far off.

Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com on 20 Nov 2009 at 3:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have talked with him too. I just don't understand how it works with botocs and
stats output..

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 20 Nov 2009 at 3:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
BOTOCS uses a report xml template that you can do a lot of different things to 
extract stats from the log file.  He has been posting the examples in the 
forum.  
The report.xml is then made based on that template and will have all the stats 
in 
there.  He then would parse the stats and then report the stats to the extra 
stats 
class.

Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com on 20 Nov 2009 at 4:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This is too much fluff for now. 
This will intersect with the new mem. matches (etc.) module.

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 20 Dec 2009 at 8:43