williamleonard / obblm

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/obblm
1 stars 0 forks source link

New ranking systems #28

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Please, everyone, post your wishes for ranking systems here.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Nimda...@gmail.com on 13 Feb 2009 at 12:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
* Ranking system for counting CAS and TD's as points, in addition to W/D/L 
points.

* The ranking system I said was "bad" has one good point: A bonus point for 
loser
when losing by one TD. It was the points for win and draw that were too low 
compared
to losing by one TD, which was bad. (W:4p, D:3p, L:1p, +1p for loosing by 1 TD. 
IMO,
should have been W:6p, D:3p, L:0p, +1 for loosing by 1 TD. I wasn't commish for 
that
league...As it was, coaches went for a safe draw instead of risking loosing a 
point.)

The point of having different examples of ranking systems is that ppl can 
(easily?)
meddle with the points to fit their league.

Original comment by blodae@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2009 at 9:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yes, but TD and CAS are already available with the latest change to the RSs?

Yep, that is the point, but it's problematic making all team fields available 
for
each tour's RS calculation since I suspect that this will slow obblm down a lot 
-
I'll have to check if this is true. Which is sad since it leads to confusion 
that not
all team fields are available for picking amongst when making new RSs.

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 18 Feb 2009 at 3:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I just listed the first one to have it in one place. It is implemented. (Thanks
Nicholas!)

Original comment by blodae@gmail.com on 18 Feb 2009 at 4:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Okey, from now on this issue-thread is dedicated to more special ranking 
systems,
like RS includning field like "+1 point for loosing by 1 TD".

I've made a easy method via settings.php for adding RS in the future, which do 
not
require fields like the one described above.

Daniel, if you have problems with having to copy/paste because of your special 
field
(the one above), then add your RS to the repository code - I'm sure others will 
use
that RS too.

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 12 Mar 2009 at 5:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Closing this one for the sake of tidying a little up. People will be likely to 
make
new threads/issues anyway.

Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com on 6 Apr 2009 at 10:44