Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
It would be neat to have two separate OBBLM installed side by side, using same
database. Especially in the case of hosting when you often only get one DB.
So I looked very quickly at doing a script for renaming the stuff needed to do
that.
It wasn't as easy as a simple grep-and-replace script, since there are comments
and
variables that also get hit by that. :-/ With an initial manual prefixing as
Juergen
requested a grep-and-replace script would be easier to do.
/Daniel
Original comment by blodae@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2009 at 12:33
Yes, it's going to be difficault replacing the correct table names since some
tables
names are also used in the php code. I don't really know how to do this
easiest. I
can't think of how to compile a regular expression that would match only table
names
within sql queries.
If doing this, then yes, of course, it should be not only a obblm_ prefix, but
some
string that one can set in the settings file.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 4 Feb 2009 at 1:38
get_alt_col() needs to be changed too.
Original comment by blodae@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2009 at 7:35
[deleted comment]
I just done the same in my obblm installation.
I duplicated the obblm DB to another obblm_alt DB [_alt stands for the
alternative
name You choose], copied ALL the files into a \alt sub directory, and changed
the
settings.php file to connect to the obblm_alt DB instead than to the existing
obblm DB.
This required to me 4 clicks, using the PHP admin web interface my ISP let at my
disposal.
1. Exported the DB with structure rebuild commands;
2. Created the a new empty DB (obblm_alt);
3. Imported the SQL DB previously exported;
4. Emptied ALL the tables to restart from scratch.
Then I changed the settings.php file to the new needed settings, and get to
work on it.
These are the two links:
MAIN DB: http://obblm.treemme.org/
_ALT DB: http://obblm.treemme.org/mnt/
Go for it...!!! And don't roll ones. ;-p
Fabio
Original comment by SincreT...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2009 at 3:53
My problem is that I only have one DB at my hosting. :-/
Original comment by blodae@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2009 at 5:10
Yep. The reason for implementing this is to (a) avoid table duplicate names for
two
pieces of software wanting to use the same table name, and (b) allow multiple
instances of obblm on one DB.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 6 Feb 2009 at 9:17
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2009 at 12:34
I was just thinking about this as I went a step further with giving wikimedia
the
ability to host as many separate wikis as you'd like using just 1 installation.
Off
hand I may be missing something but here are the basics:
During installation the script captures the subdomain as the prefix.
It creates all the tables with this prefix.
Code in wikimedia already is set to have a variable infrom of the tables name
for a
prefix.
Create the settings file with the prefix as well, subdomain_settings.php.
Either exclude prefixes less than 4 characters or specifically exclude www.
Just something to think about since you are starting from scratch with this.
You
can basically have as manay installations as you want using just 1 installation.
Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com
on 1 May 2009 at 1:06
That's not the point - in fact, what you are commenting is the only proper way
of
doing it as far as I see it.
The point is, that it's a huge job going through each mysql query in the obblm
code
to add a table prefix variable.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2009 at 2:33
Oh ok. I didn't fully understand the way you were looking at it. I
specifically
mention the single installation idea with the subdomain because when I was
researching the multiple wiki installations, the people doing multiple wikis on
the
same installation were using some off the wall things, instead of just using a
prefixed settings file as well.
Not sure if owner juergen.unfried means that he is doing this, but with you
getting
really busy soon, would you like me to do the busy work and prep this by
setting a
prefix to "" and adding it to all the code? I could do this in another branch.
Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com
on 1 May 2009 at 5:08
OK.
Thanks, but I would prefer if we let this one settle a bit longer, I'm doing
some
research into other ways of solving this issue.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2009 at 8:00
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 11 Jul 2009 at 11:02
[deleted comment]
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 20 Jul 2009 at 12:06
I am posting this here as it is related to multiple installs on one domain
name...
I may be wrong here, but I think that the SESSION would be used by all sub
directories in the same domain. This would mean that
http://www.example.com/OBBLM1
could log in as root and have full control over http://www.example.com/OBBLM2.
Is this a valid concern? If so can you configure the session to use an ID
based on
the path of the OBBLM installation?
Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com
on 11 Aug 2009 at 11:33
Yes, that is correct. It is related to the server on which the subdivision are
run.
It's an apache/ISS config, which is why we can't use this as a solution.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 14 Aug 2009 at 7:53
So if you did eventually do prefixes so that site's can run multiple
installations
of OBBLM, they would have to use subdomains.
Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com
on 19 Aug 2009 at 2:19
Oh I think .htaccess can do it for apache to allow the subdirectories to have
their
own cookies. I will test it out tonight.
Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com
on 19 Aug 2009 at 3:52
Is this prefix something that will eventually be done? If so I suggest using
constants instead. This could give greater flexibility in choosing the exact
names
of the tables being used.
Original comment by funnyfin...@hotmail.com
on 3 Sep 2009 at 4:13
Actually I don't think so.
I'm not satisfied with the solutions available, and I don't trust a script to
look
through all files and do "intelligent" substitution. It'll have to wait for some
(unlikely) future rewrite. Closing.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2009 at 4:54
Issue 271 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by Nimda...@gmail.com
on 12 Oct 2009 at 2:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
juergen....@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2009 at 2:21