Closed kevinywlui closed 8 years ago
Sorry to be dumb, but in what sense does this patch "use surjection of J1(N) onto J0(N) for computing divisor of order"??
Opps. I had to get rid of the case where J1(N) had a free part. Now if J1(N)(Q)_tor is finite then we can return a divisor of #J0(N)(Q)_tor. This is in L355-358 of torsion_subgroup.py
On Thursday, July 14, 2016, Kevin Lui notifications@github.com wrote:
Opps. I had to get rid of the case where J1(N) had a free part. Now if J1(N)(Q)_tor is finite then we can return a
J1(N) thins is always fi!nite!
I'm
divisor of #J0(N)(Q)_tor. This is in L355-358 of torsion_subgroup.py
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/williamstein/sage_modabvar/pull/26#issuecomment-232848616, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABN5dm9y0Wpf44uTb1WfIdO6xKY1TROSks5qVvf8gaJpZM4JNASz .
Sent from my massive iPhone 6 plus.
Ack. Did not mean to write the first tor.
If J1(N) is finite then J0(N) is also finite so J1(N)=J1(N)_tor and J0(N)=J0(N)_tor. So we have a surjection of J1(N)_tor onto J0(N)_tor. So now a divisor of #J0(N)_tor is also a divisor of #J1(N)_tor.
On Friday, July 15, 2016, Kevin Lui notifications@github.com wrote:
Ack. Did not mean to write the first tor.
If J1(N) is finite then J0(N) is also finite so J1(N)=J1(N)_tor and J0(N)=J0(N)_tor.
So we have a surjection of J1(N)_tor onto J0(N)_tor.
Why?? A surjection of abvars does not imply surjection on rational points...
So now a divisor of #J0(N)_tor is also a divisor of #J1(N)_tor.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/williamstein/sage_modabvar/pull/26#issuecomment-232884108, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABN5dhJ6itQ9PhakRiRLnqwdnYfgI1GSks5qVzjegaJpZM4JNASz .
Sent from my massive iPhone 6 plus.
Oh right. My bad.
Two new things: