There are a handful of helpful things I'd like the rst_parser to do:
syntax highlighting for code blocks
images that have thumbnails, are links to the larger version, have sane css classes and trivial syntax
update notes
Probably want to crib what we can from Sphinx and use code-block and literal-include for syntax highlighting, something like versionchanged for update notes, and
Might be interesting to use :ref: for links to other blog entries. I'm not sure what the ref would be, though--the blog entry title? the path?
Would be good to look at other systems and crib blog-related syntax from them, too. Also, we should document all the syntax. Maybe do something like the reST quickstart primer nixing things no one will ever use and adding our Douglas-specific syntax.
There are a handful of helpful things I'd like the rst_parser to do:
Probably want to crib what we can from Sphinx and use
code-block
andliteral-include
for syntax highlighting, something likeversionchanged
for update notes, andMight be interesting to use
:ref:
for links to other blog entries. I'm not sure what the ref would be, though--the blog entry title? the path?Would be good to look at other systems and crib blog-related syntax from them, too. Also, we should document all the syntax. Maybe do something like the reST quickstart primer nixing things no one will ever use and adding our Douglas-specific syntax.