Closed peterjc closed 11 years ago
Hello,
Thanks very much for this. I'm sorry it's taken me so long to get back to you - somehow I missed all the issue-tracking for this.
These are all excellent points;I've made these changes, and am just about to push them to GitHub.
Thanks again for getting in touch,
Will
Much better, but could you change "Biopython >=1.6" to read "Biopython >=1.60" instead (assuming you meant one dot sixty). This is a major.minor numbering scheme, not a decimal. The current release is Biopython 1.61 (one dot sixty-one), and there never was a 1.6 (one dot six). Thanks :)
Thanks for this.
You're quite right, there was never a BioPython 1.6. I've corrected and pushed.
Phew! Looks like I need some kind of automated version control checking pipeline :p
Thanks again,
Will
The read-me file currently says:
The currently version of Biopython is 1.60 (one, sixty), so something is wrong with that.
Also, having looked at the code it will not work under both Python 2 and 3 as it is, for instance you are using print statements. Therefore saying Python >=2.6 is potentially confusing as some users might try this under Python 3. I would suggest saying install Python 2.6 or 2.7 (since Python 2.7 is the final Python 2.x release).