Inverted Surplus Calculation

[bodomenke]

@wimleers First of all: Great work. Thanks!

It seems there is an issue with the calculation of surpluses or at least in the label of the surplus accessories: it is shown as <= instead of >=…

Pls see screenshot.

[wimleers]

Glad you like it!

Actually that <= is intentional: that's showing you the reason why it's currently off ("Nein" in German apparently!).

As soon as the energy signal turns on, it'll change 😊

The README says:

All energy signals have an On/Off status with a Reason to make it easy to understand why this energy signal is on or off.

Can you suggest how I should phrase that differently so that it's clear for the next person? 🙏

[wimleers]

Oh wow, this was literally your first GitHub issue?! Welcome! 😄

[bodomenke]

Glad you like it!

Actually that <= is intentional: that's showing you the reason why it's currently off ("Nein" in German apparently!).

As soon as the energy signal turns on, it'll change 😊

The README says:

All energy signals have an On/Off status with a Reason to make it easy to understand why this energy signal is on or off.

Can you suggest how I should phrase that differently so that it's clear for the next person? 🙏

I guess it is a matter of how one reads the Eve app screen and how one decodes logical expressions. 😉

I do it like this:

Surplus <= X: Nein

-> results for me in logical consequence: Surplus > X: Ja

But I got you. The „Nein“ relates to the name of the switch, which should ideally read like „500+ Surplus“ or so and the subline is simply the explanation, as you already stated.

So, I guess it is my reading failure. I will rename my switches and all is fine. 😊

[bodomenke]

Oh wow, this was literally your first GitHub issue?! Welcome! 😄

Yeah 😊😎 Thank you 👍

[wimleers]

Alright! 😊

Feel free to let me know a rephrasing suggestion when you think of a better way to explain it!