Open tstreiff opened 4 years ago
Merging #112 into master will decrease coverage by
0.02%
. The diff coverage is80.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #112 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.03% 79.01% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 351 351
Lines 46650 46705 +55
==========================================
+ Hits 36872 36906 +34
- Misses 9778 9799 +21
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
ppci/lang/c/semantics.py | 83.47% <78.26%> (-0.46%) |
:arrow_down: |
ppci/lang/c/parser.py | 91.32% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
ppci/arch/mips/instructions.py | 86.13% <0.00%> (-1.56%) |
:arrow_down: |
ppci/arch/riscv/registers.py | 93.06% <0.00%> (-0.94%) |
:arrow_down: |
ppci/binutils/dbg/debugger.py | 87.59% <0.00%> (-0.65%) |
:arrow_down: |
ppci/binutils/dbg/gdb/client.py | 53.14% <0.00%> (-0.43%) |
:arrow_down: |
ppci/wasm/util.py | 38.70% <0.00%> (-0.43%) |
:arrow_down: |
ppci/arch/token.py | 95.73% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
ppci/wasm/components.py | 81.71% <0.00%> (+0.28%) |
:arrow_up: |
ppci/lang/tools/lr.py | 96.49% <0.00%> (+0.38%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4e98d2b...31d1070. Read the comment docs.
This change looks very well! Could you add some test cases to prevent this bug from re-appearing? I'm sure you ran some test snippets to test this code. I suggest to add those to either test_c.py or otherwise to a C
example snippet in the folder test/samples
.
…tch expression is of integer type and apply integer promotion on it. Ensure default statements is not used twice for a given switch. Ensure case values (or ranges for the GCC extension) are integer constants, and that no case value or range is in conflict with the preceding cases of the same switch.