Closed kishoreg closed 5 years ago
Merging #22 into develop will decrease coverage by
0.43%
. The diff coverage is8.22%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #22 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 65.24% 64.81% -0.44%
Complexity 4 4
=============================================
Files 1046 1048 +2
Lines 54117 54397 +280
Branches 7708 7757 +49
=============================================
- Hits 35307 35255 -52
- Misses 16253 16579 +326
- Partials 2557 2563 +6
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | Complexity Δ | |
---|---|---|---|
...inot/pql/parsers/pql2/ast/OutputColumnAstNode.java | 93.54% <ø> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
...t/core/query/selection/SelectionOperatorUtils.java | 93.01% <ø> (-0.03%) |
0 <0> (ø) |
|
...e/pinot/core/operator/query/SelectionOperator.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (?) |
|
.../operator/transform/TransformBlockDataFetcher.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (?) |
|
.../core/startree/plan/StarTreeTransformPlanNode.java | 75% <100%> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
.../org/apache/pinot/core/plan/TransformPlanNode.java | 50% <19.04%> (-24.2%) |
0 <0> (ø) |
|
.../org/apache/pinot/core/plan/SelectionPlanNode.java | 48.83% <57.14%> (-12.46%) |
0 <0> (ø) |
|
...not/core/operator/transform/TransformOperator.java | 90.47% <80%> (-3.97%) |
0 <0> (ø) |
|
...er/validation/BrokerResourceValidationManager.java | 50% <0%> (-31.25%) |
0% <0%> (ø) |
|
...he/pinot/core/query/pruner/ValidSegmentPruner.java | 57.14% <0%> (-28.58%) |
0% <0%> (ø) |
|
... and 36 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89aa228...b4defa8. Read the comment docs.
We currently support expressions and udf's in aggregation and group by but not in selection and filters. This PR adds support for expressions in selection.
Note that with this PR, we add the support in query execution but the pql parsing does not support it. All udfs in select list are treated as aggregation functions by default. The reason is that AggregationFunctionType is in pinot-core, we will have to move it to pinot-common so that we can check for the name and decide if its a simple function vs aggregation function. Will add that in another PR.
Existing test cases passed.