Closed romangg closed 5 months ago
Let's remove it for now and if afterwards we see that it shouldn't have been removed we can add it back.
@frmonteiro since you already have experience with removing QtSurfaceExtension maybe you want to solve the issue here too?
In GitLab by @frmonteiro on May 8, 2020, 19:44
I could try doing that.
In GitLab by @frmonteiro on May 8, 2020, 20:14
Should I also remove org_kde_kwin_server_decoration_palette_manager
?
The palette class is for a different and independent protocol even though names are very similar. Look into client/protocol where you can find both xml.
Actually the palette one should be a very contained one and it's small. So if you want to give porting one class a shot again you can try the palette one after deleting the server decoration class. :)
mentioned in commit 7b4d69ba976e5e6fc037a196ebd5d42c46f0dc00
Closed by eb686af0e3e5bfc02a9584b4566c3ee9029badb0.
closed
mentioned in commit 9214ac1deaff61018f6a1588ca71eb858ebdcfdd
The protocol: src/client/protocols/server-decoration.xml
It is replaced by xdg-decoration what is already supported by Wrapland.
So can we just remove the old one and not bother remodeling it? Or are there still some consumers?