Open RobEnduro opened 2 years ago
Thank you for your suggestion. What would you expect the connector should look like in the output diagram if implementing such a feature? Should it just be added as pin with a special name, or is that not enough?
Currently, there is no shield specifier for connectors, but you can specify custom pin names, e.g. like this if you want a pin named s
:
connectors:
X1:
type: D-Sub
subtype: female
pinlabels: [DCD, RX, TX, DTR, GND, DSR, RTS, CTS, RI, SHIELD]
pins: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, s]
Does this create the diagram you want, or would you like something different?
As a workaround, I probably would do something just like this. The only thing that seems off in this case is that the info given in the header box is "10-pin" on what is known as a 9-pin connector. I feel like what happens in the wire bundles would work fine in this kind of case, where only the explicit wires are counted and +S gets appended.
The only thing that seems off in this case is that the info given in the header box is "10-pin" on what is known as a 9-pin connector.
You can specify pincount: 9
in addition to the pins
and pinlabels
lists. This way, the explicit pincout will drive what is shown in the top row of the connector node.
At this time, it doesn't seem like its possible to define a shield for connectors, only for cables. Take Demo 01 for an example, where X1 is a 9-pin D-sub. It has pin 5 connected to the cable shield. Generally, D-Sub connectors have a metal housing which could of course form electrical connection. Outside of defining a "9-pin" connector with an explicit 10th pin for this purpose, is this something that can be done, or a possible feature that could be added?