Closed kvid closed 3 months ago
Please consider my comment on the original issue, but generally I am all in favor of making placeholder syntax consistent and therefore, of amending the Readme (please do) and merging this PR.
I see some recent force-pushes so I will wait for a final review request before merging :)
@formatc1702 must must check if this suggested change (placeholder name consistency) is OK, or if it might have some bad side-effects. If there is a good reason to keep this one placeholder very different from the others, then that reason should be explained in a code comment.
A bonus advantage by using the name
<!-- %template_sheetsize% -->
, is that it will be easy to later generalize by letting any string or numericmetadata.{item}.{key}
entry replace the corresponding<!-- %{item}_{key}% -->
placeholder.~TODO: If both PR #371 and this PR is accepted, then the
templates/README.md
file must be updated.~ (it is now updated)Fixes #377