Open cybrosa opened 6 years ago
This would be really good to have! The short answer is, this will be kind of hard to do so we haven't gotten around to it yet. I think we could probably do this without a query parameter by just looking at whether the reflexive form ends in -self
or -selves
, which is my favored solution.
I just added this to the FAQ because it's come up before: https://github.com/witch-house/pronoun.is#can-we-add-pluralization-support-ie-themself-vs-themselves
Also, the repo was in pretty poor shape when you first opened this issue so I wasn't really excited about getting you up to speed on it, but I've had a chance to get it tidied up since then!
If you're still willing to take this on I'd be happy to talk about the design and help get a PR through :)
Looking at just the reflexive suffix doesn't work, because I think even most people that go with "themself" still use other pluralizations ("They throw the frisbee to themself"), just like with "you" ("You throw the frisbee to yourself").
Would it be possible to just have pronoun.is/they///themself
?
As it is currently:
It is unclear which verb form I should use for the present tense form of demonstrated pronouns.
What would be nice: anything that has a plural verb form, like present tense:
This way plurality is clearly demonstrated without being confusing. For ease of development, you could easily change the example to:
That way all verbs can be "singularized" simply by adding an
s
.Plural/singular could by specified in the database with an additional
\ttrue|false
for "is plural" on each line. If specifying non-in-database plurals, I propose this URL structure for "natural" structure:reads "My pronoun is he, but I conjugate the verbs as plural."
I do not feel adequately prepared to use a neopronoun when I read the pronoun.is examples, because I don't know how to conjugate the verbs. This is, in my opinion, a big problem.
I'd be happy to work on this, if this is considered a good idea.