chore: remove Git LFS because it's expensive for open-source projects

[giladgd]

Description of change

• chore: remove Git LFS because it's expensive for open-source projects

Weirdly, hosting an open-source Git project on GitHub is free, but Git LFS for such projects costs money. GitHub charges for every git clone that downloads the LFS objects, even when cloned by people who are not even members of the project.

This repo had 14MB of git LFS objects, and the free monthly quota of 1GB bandwidth of LFS objects was reached very quickly due to people cloning this repo. GitHub should do something about this since it's stupid to make people use regular Git for non-textual files for open-source projects just because it's free. It doesn't make sense to make regular git free for open-source projects and, at the same time, charge for the bandwidth of LFS objects that are so small for these projects.

Pull-Request Checklist

• [x] Code is up-to-date with the master branch
• [x] npm run format to apply eslint formatting
• [x] npm run test passes with this change
• [x] This pull request links relevant issues as Fixes #0000
• [ ] There are new or updated unit tests validating the change
• [ ] Documentation has been updated to reflect this change
• [x] The new commits and pull request title follow conventions explained in pull request guidelines (PRs that do not follow this convention will not be merged)

[github-actions[bot]]

:tada: This PR is included in version 2.8.8 :tada:

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release
• v2.8.8

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

[github-actions[bot]]

:tada: This PR is included in version 3.0.0-beta.12 :tada:

The release is available on:

• npm package (@beta dist-tag)
• GitHub release
• v3.0.0-beta.12

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket: