Closed raffaelfoidl closed 2 years ago
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 18, 2022, 02:02
added 1 commit
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 19, 2022, 13:14
requested review from @11712616
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 13:41
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 193
"applicable to given exercise"
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 13:41
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/service/impl/WorkoutLogServiceImpl.java line 270
Should probably be ServerError.EXERCISE_LOG_NOT_FOUND
.
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 13:41
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 148
Is this error really dependent on the name specifically? The documentation of all other related errors is about the identifier.
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 13:41
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 158
"the current request method"
Also, with "request method" I associate GET, POST etc. Maybe omit the "method"? Or did you include it for a specific reason? If so, what was the reason?
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 13:41
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/web/infrastructure/ValidationFailureControllerAdvice.java line 104
"advice" instead of "device"?
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 193
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/service/impl/WorkoutLogServiceImpl.java line 270
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 158
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/web/infrastructure/ValidationFailureControllerAdvice.java line 104
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
added 4 commits
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 193
-> c0e1ac5d7b6f4b356eba76473996b33d6b875210
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/service/impl/WorkoutLogServiceImpl.java line 270
-> 4e41b37891430c57bbc57b9896dc51087573a94e
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 148
Yes, we don't allow users to create exercises with duplicate names (ExerciseServiceImpl
):
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 158
You are right regarding "request method".
-> 7d82e05c89426ba4da0ee246c01096ad8d633a9d
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:14
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/web/infrastructure/ValidationFailureControllerAdvice.java line 104
:face_palm:
-> 638098e1ac949bf0dd884e4cae6636192a1d55c3
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:19
marked this merge request as ready
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:28
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 148
But what's the difference to the respective error for initial exercises, for example? That one is thrown if an admin tries to create an initial exercise with a name that is already "assigned" to another initial exercise, basically the same behavior as for the user exercises. Why reference the identifier in the documentation of one error and the name in the documentation for the other? I'm sorry, I don't get it. :(
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:37
added 1 commit
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:37
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 148
Hm, that's because the documentation of the other one is wrong.
-> cc329990843f6c515493cc88bc3d6bdea760c8a6
But what else do you mean? You said "all other related errors" - I checked and other related errors are directly referring to "UID", "email" or the like - so what other instances of name vs identifier are you not content with?
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:51
Commented on server/src/main/java/com/witness/server/enumeration/ServerError.java line 148
Honestly, I think I simply misunderstood the meaning of "identifier". You mean the concrete ID, right? I somehow thought that it has a more "general" meaning, i.e. it is a way of saying that "the set value already exists for the used means of identification". For example, if I try to create a new exercise with an already taken name, the "identifier" refers to the name. If there are other fields that have to be unique, then the error can be reused without having to adjust the documentation (if we were to use "identifier" this way - which I'm not suggesting, just for clarification). But forget it, it was just a misunderstanding on my side.
Thanks for correcting the documentation!
In GitLab by @11712616 on Jan 24, 2022, 14:51
approved this merge request
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 17:18
resolved all threads
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 17:22
added 3 commits
develop
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 17:23
added 1 commit
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 24, 2022, 17:47
mentioned in commit 14eecfcd63680c455dd094aad37a619035926dba
In GitLab by @11775820 on Jan 18, 2022, 24:44
Merges 60-include-error-key-in-all-json-error-responses -> develop
Closes #60.
Should be merged after !21
New for validation errors: To be consistent with other Spring errors,
BAD REQUEST
is now lowercased and we include the request path:The main contribution of this ticket: For all other errors wrapped by spring (with
ServerException
orServerRuntimeException
as cause) include those fields too:There is (to my knowledge) only one exception to this statement: the regular "forbidden" error - because it's not caused by an exception in the first place, but by a Spring filter. One would have to create a
@ControllerAdvice
and hijack the correct base implementation. And I don't care about this use case enough to do it with this ticket.