wking / fsf-api

FSF License Metadata API
MIT License
4 stars 7 forks source link

Review FSF referenced licenses which do not have an associated SPDX license ID #4

Open goneall opened 6 years ago

goneall commented 6 years ago

This list should be reviewed ideally with FSF to see if they should match an SPDX license. We could also consider adding some of the licenses to the SPDX license list.

The following FSF license tags did not have any obvious match to an SPDX license:

wking commented 6 years ago

I've updated this list following this comment with the results of:

$ jq -r 'to_entries[] | select(.value.identifiers.spdx | not) | .key' licenses-full.json | sort -f

on 7822d52d8. If we pick out only the libre licenses, we have about half as many:

$ jq -r 'to_entries[] | select(.value.identifiers.spdx | not) | select(.value.tags | contains(["libre"])) | .key' licenses-full.json | sort -f
ACDL
Arphic
CryptixGeneralLicense
dsl
ecfonts
FreeArt
GPLFonts
GPLOther
informal
josl
OpenPublicationL
PerlLicense
Phorum
PublicDomain
Python
Python1.6a2
Python1.6b1
Python2.1
SISSL
Unicode
WebM
Zope
goneall commented 6 years ago

@kestewart @wking I also updated SPDX licenses preview with the results from the JSON file

wking commented 6 years ago

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:08:49PM +0000, goneall wrote:

I also updated SPDX licenses preview with the results from the JSON file.

That “FSF Free/Libre?” column looks entirely blank at the moment.

goneall commented 6 years ago

That “FSF Free/Libre?” column looks entirely blank at the moment.

Fixed - uploaded a new version to the website