Closed drzraf closed 9 years ago
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:45:46AM -0800, Raphaël Droz wrote:
The attached patch (against Debian Jessie's r2e 3.9) addresses both issues:
Looks good to me :). Can you open a pull request with this patch as a commit? Or should I create the commit for you? In either case, I'll need your Signed-off-by to land it. See 1 for details.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:17:01AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
Or should I create the commit for you?
yes, please do it. I don't have any clone under the hang right now (and I secretly hope the patch will cleanly apply to master).
For the Signed-Off: Rapha�l Droz raphael.droz+floss@gmail.com And for an (ideal) future: "I hereby accept the licence change to GPLv3 or later" "I hereby accept the licence change to AGPLv3 or later" (preferred) :)
Seems that Github "Reply by email" assume UTF-8 even in presence of
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
The firstname should (obviously ?) be read "Raphaël", sorry
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:18:59PM -0800, Raphaël Droz wrote:
Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:17:01AM -0800, W. Trevor King:
Or should I create the commit for you?
yes, please do it.
I've got that in a commit (9b3bf149, feeds: follow symlinks of datafile and configfile, 2015-02-20), which I pushed and then clawed back ;), because...
"I hereby accept the licence change to GPLv3 or later" "I hereby accept the licence change to AGPLv3 or later" (preferred) :)
You also need to accept GPLv2, since rss2email is under GPLv2 or (at your option) GPLv3. It's a weird choice inherited from rss2email v2.64 (2008-10-21, 1). I'd be fine with GPLv2+, but I'm not excited enough about it to figure out who's inherited Aaron Swartz's copyright and asking them if they're comfortable changing it. Can you ok the GPLv2?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:42:27PM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
Can you ok the GPLv2?
Oh yes, I obviously accept the GPLv2 too! (I'm sorry to not have made it clear)
Thanks :). I've pushed 9b3bf14 to master an I'm closing this issue. Please re-open if it doesn't work for some reason ;).
Use case, configfile contains sensible data, and is in a specific directory, and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME is a symlink. When configfile is saved (rewritten + renamed), we want don't want to overwrite the symlink itself but the original file.
The same applies for datafile. The attached patch (against Debian Jessie's r2e 3.9) addresses both issues: