Closed wklumpen closed 3 years ago
Are we reasonably confident this will work consistently across all regions/dates? If so, I can plan to update this.
@dana-rg @aakarner I wonder if you have thoughts on this request.
@wklumpen I think this is a good idea and I would think it would work ok across regions / destination types at least in principle. There may be some areas where there is quite a bit above 4, but I guess we could see. And I wonder how many are <1 though I can see the value in having a bin to show that its none if that's the case. Would we do the same for the primal measures? Right now those are set as transit access / auto access so they are <1 so the explanation is the opposite, but this could be switched (e.g. 4 times as many jobs reachable by car).
I really don't think the primal measures will work, since they aren't normalized in any way (the ratios are somewhat). The pure scale of accessible jobs is so different in cities.
Yeah... that makes sense. Scratch that comment.
Shelving this for a future update/consideration.
Made the update, looks good! Will be reflected when I push v1.0.0
If possible: legend for Transit-Car ratios of travel times as set, rather than percentile-based, bins: <1, <2, <3, <4, >4. I think it's easy to understand what equal travel time vs. travel time that's 4x as long means, and there is a certain value to identifying the areas that have consistently competitive transit service - as fast or faster than traveling by car.