Closed wkumler closed 1 day ago
I'm actually not sure what the typo is here - line 239 currently says
highly correlated with the second PC of the dataset (r = .697, % variance explained by PC2 = 15.4,
which makes me think the reviewer would like to have the 0 in front of the decimal. Happy to do this if it's the norm but I thought that correlations were reported without it?
Actually it seems like the convention is to report the 0 so I've changed this here and throughout the manuscript. Fixed with b09875fe.
This change still needs to be propagated to the figures themselves!
Fixed again with de4da21
Reviewer 2 | 04 Oct 2024 | 12:20 Line 239 Typo r = 0.697