Closed wmakley closed 5 years ago
Do you have a plan for this? Could just call it simpleserializer
?
Well my concerns are:
In short, I want it to be discoverable as an AMS replacement, and to have the name represent what it actually does. Here are some options I considered:
Let me know if anything jumps out at you, I'm open to suggestions. I'd like to push it to rubygems.
Fair enough regarding simpleserializer
.
To be honest I don't love any of those names.
I am poking around AMS and kind of like this name: https://github.com/rails-api/active_model_serializers/blob/0-10-stable/lib/active_model/serializable_resource.rb
SimpleSerializableResource
How about tiny_serializer
? Would really love to have this up on rubygems.
Love it, works for me. Stay tuned.
Unfamiliar with what happens in Github when I rename a repo... will everyone's installation break?
Great question, I think it is fine, https://help.github.com/articles/renaming-a-repository/
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 8:32 AM William Makley <notifications@github.com wrote:
Unfamiliar with what happens in Github when I rename a repo... will everyone's installation break?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/wmakley/simple_serializer/issues/1#issuecomment-439393763, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AApILgLlEVatQt4Y-yuTODnyeZBpMdJTks5uvr50gaJpZM4VIMuS .
Yup, found that! Renamed, tested, and published.
gem 'tiny_serializer', '~> 2.0.0'
should do the trick!
Need to do a release to rubygems.org, but there is already a gem named simple_serializer