github-actions[bot]
commented
2 months ago Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.
I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========
Full logs for geometryDataChecks
OVERALL STATUS: 2 checks are failing. I have some recommendations for you on how you might fix these.
fileChecks: You submitted at least one file that is missing a meta.txt, which is required. Please make sure your meta.txt is in the root of your submitted zip file - I have not yet been programmed to look in folders for your meta.txt.
Full logs for fileChecks
geometryDataChecks: All checks PASSED. Nothing that needs to be done here right now.
Full logs for geometryDataChecks
metaChecks: It looks like your metadata has one or more errors - take a look at the logs to see what you need to fix.
Full logs for metaChecks
----- Preview ----- 
Why do we need this boundary?
The current data for AFG_ADM1 in gbOpen has very low resolution and comparing ADM1 to ADM2 creates significant mismatches.
Current data
Proposed data
Anything Unusual?
I created this from a district-by-district dissolve of the data currently in AFG_ADM2 on gbOpen.