Open maxmalynowsky opened 2 months ago
Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.
I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========
Full logs for fileChecks
Full logs for geometryDataChecks
Full logs for metaChecks
All checks have passed! I'll flag your boundary submission for a manual review by one of my humans.
Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.
I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========
Full logs for fileChecks
Full logs for geometryDataChecks
Full logs for metaChecks
All checks have passed! I'll flag your boundary submission for a manual review by one of my humans.
Why do we need this boundary?
Update sources for 2024. Remove the legislative layer Canton from ADM4 and promote Administrative Commune from ADM5 to ADM4. Include Region / Department / Arrondissement / Commune layers for all overseas territories.
Anything Unusual?