Open JosiahParry opened 8 months ago
Hi @JosiahParry ,
Sure, we have made the necessary changes to the package. Instead of using a cache directory, we have implemented functionality to utilize a temporary directory, which can be easily managed and removed.
The updated version of the package with these changes has been pushed. I hope this resolves the issue you were facing. Please feel free to test the new functionality and let us know if you encounter any further issues or have any feedback.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention, and we appreciate your patience and support!
Best regards, Rohith
Someone is providing me with a reproducible example that uses this package. However, the package cannot be used without using a cache to store data on disk. I do not want to store data on disk in a hard to access location that cannot easily be removed.
Can you consider creating functionality for the package to work with only in memory usage?