Closed amilan17 closed 12 months ago
Thanks @amilan17.
@antoinemerle I made some editorial changes (see https://github.com/wmo-im/BUFR4/compare/de70ce8e56c2f2a5fee11be858b5a9860c398521...161-proposal-for-new-bufr-table-entries-for-eps-sg-eumetsat-iasi-ng-level-2-and-vii-level-2)) and have some comments for your consideration.
Thanks.
Hi @amilan17 ,
Quick question : When you mean "Have comments for your consideration" you mean that probably I "click" on the Ready for review ? I am not able to see any of your comments apart the changes you've made
Second point which is interesting for my future self , I got an automated scripts that push the changes inside the PR branch. I would be interested that you confirm the two follow assumption :
thanks a million for confirming that, I will update my script accordingly :)
@antoinemerle
Quick question : When you mean "Have comments for your consideration" you mean that probably I "click" on the Ready for review ? I am not able to see any of your comments apart the changes you've made
I forgot to submit my review -- you should see the comments now.
- table should always start with capital 'T' : "Table"
T should not be capitalized when referencing "Code table" and "Flag table"
- the following char "-" is prohibited in code name
No, it's not prohibited. I removed it in "Water-vapour" for consistency with same term in other tables
Hi @amilan17 ,
I implemented all the comment's you've made. Really glad that you made this review and gave me feedback. I am taking in account all the notes and advices you gave me.
Please do not hesitate to check again for consistency the full sequence.
On my side I will review and go through my proposal to implement the following across the sequences. replacing the
Set to "something" with 9
by
=9 "Something"
@antoinemerle thank you for your updates. I made some copyedit changes that I'd appreciate you taking a quick look at. 89073a1
HI @amilan17 , Thanks a million time for your review. I am really sorry that you spent so much time to edit my PR....
I think we (the group) can try to :
pdf
guideline for anyone pushing data in the branch in order to know the correct "nomenclature" to follow to respect the WMO one.pdf
guide on how to use github and specific branch.On my side, I am going to implement all the things we saw together in my SW that is converting my csv
table in the WMO ones...
Thanks again
I review your changes, and it is fine according to me. Thanks a million for chaning the SO2
to sulphur dioxide
in the title.
161