wmo-im / GRIB2

GRIB2
MIT License
21 stars 9 forks source link

Code Table 4.2: new entries requested by Norway #85

Closed rmla-cz closed 2 years ago

rmla-cz commented 3 years ago

Branch

https://github.com/wmo-im/GRIB2/tree/issue85

Stakeholder

Summary and purpose

This document proposes new GRIB2 Code Table 4.2 parameters.

Action proposed

The Team is requested to review the proposed new parameter and approve it for implementation.

Discussions

The tables in this proposal contain parameters that will be of crucial importance for the Copernicus Arctic Regional Reanalysis project which has already started its production in 2020. These parameters have been widely used as GRIB1 local parameters in the HIRLAM numerical weather prediction community, and we thus believe they will be of high relevance outside the aforementioned reanalysis project.

Final Proposal

Parameter Product Discipline Parameter Category Parameter number Units
Snow evaporation rate  (see Note 8) 0 1 148 kg m-2 s-1
Surface roughness for heat (see Note 1) 0 2 47 m
Surface roughness for moisture (see Note 2) 0 2 48 m

Initial proposal

Proposed new entry for Code Table 4.2:

Parameter Product Discipline Parameter Category Parameter number Units
Snow evaporation rate 1) 0 1 To be decided kg m-2 s-1
Surface roughness for heat 2) 0 2 To be decided m
Surface roughness for moisture 3) 0 2 To be decided m

Comments:

  1. Snow evaporation is the accumulated amount of water that has evaporated from snow from the snow-covered area of a grid-box. The existing parameter 62 Snow evaporation [kg m-2] should be deprecated
  2. Surface roughness for heat is a measure of the surface resistance to heat transfer. It is a component of surface roughness.
  3. Surface roughness for moisture is a measure of the surface resistance to moisture transfer. It is a component of surface roughness.
sebvi commented 3 years ago

I have been in Contact with the proposer to help them formulate their request so I assigned the issue to myself to review/validate

sebvi commented 3 years ago

branch updated

jitsukoh commented 3 years ago

@sebvi @amilan17 I confirm that this proposal is finalized and the branch is updated, and move this issue to "Validated" status.

jitsukoh commented 3 years ago

@sebvi sorry I should have asked you before I moved this issue to "Validated";

amilan17 commented 3 years ago

@sebvi These are my suggestions for notes in Code Table 4.2. If these notes are intended to be published and you agree with the suggestion, please update the note_en column ("see Note X") in branch and update the original proposal with final solution. (If you cannot update the original proposal, I will do this for you.)

sebvi commented 3 years ago

@amilan17 I am happy with your suggestions