Q from pub department on Requirements class "core"

[amilan17]

Dependency  
OGC API – Features – Part 1: Core corrigendum (OGC: OGC 17-069r)  

Preconditions   
The record conforms to OGC API – Records – Core: Part 1: Requirements Class: Record Core

...I can clearly see that the official name for this standard is “OGC API – Features – Part 1: Core corrigendum”. I am trying to do a similar check for the name of the product in the next row: “OGC API – Records – Core: Part 1: Requirements Class: Record Core”. The OGC web site uses the name “OGC API - Records - Part 1: Core” (shttps://ogcapi.ogc.org/records/) which is different from the name given here. Are the words “Requirements Class: Record Core” intended to be part of the name of the standard? Any clarification you could provide would be most helpful.

[amilan17]

Does it make sense to change it to:

The record conforms to the Requirements Class “Record Core” of OGC API - Records - Part 1: Core

[tomkralidis]

The dependency is referencing the entire standard, which defines optional Requirements Classes. So the dependency passes. The pre-condition specifies (exactly) which Requirements Class in OGC API - Records is assumed when specifying the WCMP2 Requirements Class.

[amilan17]

@tomkralidis So does it make sense to change the way the Preconditions is written to?

Preconditions
The record conforms to the Requirements Class “Record Core” of OGC API - Records - Part 1: Core

[tomkralidis]

Sure.