Closed joergklausen closed 3 years ago
GAW Secretariat requests the following change which better represents its current Structure:
GAW Programmes and Networks Structure
GAW > GAW Global GAW Regional GAW Local
GAW Contributing > TCCON EARLINET IMPROVE AD-Net LALINET NADP INDAAF MPLNET CASTNET IAGOS EANET ICOS
GAW Other > AEROCAN German AOD Network PHOTONS PolarAOD SKYNET SibRad CAPMoN CLN EMEP ESRLCCG NDACC SHADOZ Non-Affiliated
Proposal Correct the paths of the current program/network tree where necessary as indicated above by @Netcheva on 8 Sep 2020 in https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/blob/Issue-%23191/tables_en/2-02.csv and in OSCAR/Surface with immediate effect.
Reason The existing program/network tree as defined in https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/blob/Issue-%23191/tables_en/2-02.csv presents incorrect paths for the GAW program that do fully reflect reality and that needs to be corrected. This change does not affect the http://codes.wmo.int/wmdr/ProgramAffiliation listing, which only lists name, notation, and description. It does affect OSCAR/Surface, where the path is used to organize programs/networks. This issue is linked to issues #188 and #189 that require corrections of elements. These changes need to go through Fast Track.
Branch created at https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/compare/master...Issue%23187. Note that other branches affect the same table. @Netcheva, @tomkralidis Please review and confirm or comment. Also, please confirm (or suggest what to do with) the following elements that are part of the code table but do not appear in @Netcheva's list:
@joergklausen agree with your suggestions (we need to clarify what the strategy is around deprecating entries).
Regarding the second programme on @joergklausen's list: In OSCAR/Surface the entry AERONET has a different path. Please confirm if the following proposal for this entry is correct.
AERONET | \Non-affiliated\AERONET | AERONET | AErosol RObotic NETwork |
---|
Branch is updated, view differences: https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/commit/e05670710f546d203d4efcea8a96d49848b63e7f#diff-a066c50c20373fc15bcd759e58529c31867ae12caecaa7d36ad762 This leads to the following structure:
GAW Global
GAW Regional
GAW Local
GAW Contributing networks
GAW Other networks
@Netcheva, Oksana, please review the branch.
on behalf of Stoyka Netcheva and Oksana Tarasova: We request only one change with proposed structure namely taking out "Non-Affiliated" from proposed tree and leaving the rest as it shows right now. Please note that we will be requesting a name correction from ESRLCCG to ESRLCCGG as we expect this requires a new action request.
Also, we discussed on 6 January the option of creating a label similar to "Centennial" to allow for additional affiliation for the GALION networks
@Netcheva, @tarasova-wmo, thanks for your comments. I'll update the branch accordingly. The changes regarding GALION are made in the branch for the issue, that deals with this problem (https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/issues/189, branch: https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/blob/Issue-%23189/tables_en/2-02.csv)
@fstuerzl Can you post the link to the relevant branch again, please?
Branch validated
@joergklausen @fstuerzl Which one is correct?
2 is correct, contributing network
Branch https://github.com/wmo-im/wmds/tree/Issue%23187