Authors in linguistics, cog sci etc. often have papers on philosophy topics and others on non-philosophy. Would be good to ignore the latter.
(This used to be part of the "spam" score, but it should be a separate field: papers that are clear cases of papers but not philosophy often made it past the spam threshold.)
Authors in linguistics, cog sci etc. often have papers on philosophy topics and others on non-philosophy. Would be good to ignore the latter.
(This used to be part of the "spam" score, but it should be a separate field: papers that are clear cases of papers but not philosophy often made it past the spam threshold.)