At the moment, LoadDictionary assumes that the dictionary is located in a separate file on FS.
This limits ways of storing the dictionary.
E.g. resource or remote storage are out of options unless file is copied locally.
Alternatively all records could be parsed one by one, that however, would require writing usage code, which is almost identical to the body of the LoadDictionary.
P.S. I'm happy with doing a pull request in case it is an acceptable change
At the moment, LoadDictionary assumes that the dictionary is located in a separate file on FS. This limits ways of storing the dictionary. E.g. resource or remote storage are out of options unless file is copied locally.
Alternatively all records could be parsed one by one, that however, would require writing usage code, which is almost identical to the body of the LoadDictionary.
P.S. I'm happy with doing a pull request in case it is an acceptable change