Open slomp opened 1 year ago
I second this. One usecase I have is that I want to record with TracyAlloc/TracyFree at a low level in the stack (e.g. by hooking into malloc), but I only want to record allocations above a certain size threshold. So e.g. during allocation
if (size > 1024)
TracyAlloc(ptr, size)
but if I just do TracyFree(ptr)
blindly during deallocation then it will fail. The only workaround that I can see is manually keeping track of the pointers, but that's cumbersome and feels redundant since Tracy already does it.
Maybe a new TracyFree
variant that does not require a matching allocation, e.g. TracyFreeO (for optional)?
I 'third' this? I haven't added any additional tracing related instrumentation to my code, but all the sudden this happens. Is there any way to troubleshoot it?
This seems to be a deliberate decision. I was wondering if it would be better to just take note of them (by marking them as "unmatched" in memory profiler window) instead of disconnecting the profiler and dropping the session, since analyzing the events in the profiler can be useful to help "match" the allocation.