Closed orcmid closed 1 year ago
Can you elaborate on what you see as the defect here? Are you reporting a language design defect, a language design opinion, or a defect in the language specification?
@amyjko
Can you elaborate on what you see as the defect here? Are you reporting a language design defect, a language design opinion, or a defect in the language specification?
Sorry for being obtuse about it. I think "numeral" is a better name than "number" for the lexical production. You use numeral in the comment after that production and I applaud that.
I am separately grumpy about using the pi and infinity symbols as numerals, since they are not numerals of the kind the production elaborates otherwise. They are not (computationally) definite for one thing. Or at least they won't be in Wordplay programs. (I also think that the ALGOL 60 and other languages using real as a type was a disservice. That may all be FORTRAN's fault. The C/C++ use of float (and also int) and others was a serious improvement.)
I know not to fight the last to the death, but I would rather not have a language be casual about pi and especially infinity.
π
refers to JavaScript's Math.PI
approximation, which is definite. Being pedantic about that is fine; this isn't a programming language that intends to be mathematical in the way you want to it to be, since that's not it's goal.
∞
explicitly refers to Decimal.js Infinity semantics, which you can read up on here:
https://mikemcl.github.io/decimal.js/#zero-nan-infinity
Again, the goal isn't to faithfully represent mathematics.
Expected behavior
The distinction between numerals and numbers is nicely made at
LANGUAGE.md
line 73.Actual behavior
The use of number in the production at
LANGUAGE.md
line 71 seems unfortunate.I am also a bit uncomfortable with the inclusion of pi and infinity. They are very different in kind from the numerals and I think this is going to be troublesome for the departure from mathematics this requires, no matter how much CS tolerates them.