I just added a brief explanation of how we treat the zeros in the Watts and MLD and solved the issue of the double references in the fourth chapter. The solution was to add a final chapter that includes only the references of the whole book. A few things,
The explanation I provided for the Watts and the MLD is unjustified. I merely say that for consistency with previous releases or for consistency with other measures, we opted for the current decisions. Yet, I am not sure this either accurate or correct to put in a text like this.
I said that we are currently doing some research on this problem of zeros, but the it might seem an exaggeration, though I know that Christoph would like to invest some time on this. I also have done some simulations that can show to you, which are about how much the mld changes depending on the size of the share of zeros in the sample.
I have set up my Rstudio to break any line longer than 70 something lines in .Rmd documents and I did not realized about that after I had made my modifications. It may seem to you that I modified all the line of the document, but it is just the break of the lines. Nothing more.
I think is all for now, but please let me know if you have any question.
Hi @danielmahler ,
I just added a brief explanation of how we treat the zeros in the Watts and MLD and solved the issue of the double references in the fourth chapter. The solution was to add a final chapter that includes only the references of the whole book. A few things,
I think is all for now, but please let me know if you have any question.
Best,