Closed kbjarkefur closed 4 years ago
@mariaruth Would this level of detail fit better into a wiki page than the main text of the book? it's a general question for us to keep in mind, i think the level of detail varies quite a bit across chapters.
@bbdaniels bbdaniels 7 days ago Author Member I think this might be important enough to include in the text, but maybe could be sidebarred
👍 , if we allow our self slightly larger discussions at this moment, then I think this should be included
Restructured a little in #399, i think this flows more clearly now. @bbdaniels @kbjarkefur if you approve, close the issue.
I approve closure, I liked this order much better
@kbjarkefur I think the section on LaTeX should come before the section with tools such as DropBox paper, Rmarkdown and dyndoc, as LaTeX has proven to not be a fad and has been the staple of this for decades.
@bbdaniels It's currently after because it is a special case of dynamic document. I don't see how it could be reversed, but I clarified a bit in a68c08b. Improvements here welcome.
@mariaruth In terms of structure, i think it would be useful to tie these tools into a workflow. Something like - dynamic docs are helpful for exploratory analysis / preparing intermediate outputs, but latex is best practice for the actual manuscript.