Word search

[luizaandrade]

Just fixing small things. This will probably create conflicts with Ben's new pull requests, though. Solves most of #295, and closes #387, #370, #191, #396

[mariaruth]

Didn’t we agree to change all to “dataset” not “data set”?

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 25, 2020, at 8:36 PM, Luiza Andrade notifications@github.com wrote:

 @luizaandrade commented on this pull request.

In chapters/handling-data.tex:

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ \subsection{Research reproducibility} producing these kinds of resources can lead to that as well. Therefore, your code should be written neatly with clear instructions and published openly. It should be easy to read and understand in terms of structure, style, and syntax. -Finally, the corresponding dataset should be openly accessible +Finally, the corresponding data setshould be openly accessible ⬇️ Suggested change -Finally, the corresponding data setshould be openly accessible +Finally, the corresponding data set should be openly accessible — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[luizaandrade]

that is very possible 🤦‍♀

[luizaandrade]

Ok, I should clearly not be doing this so late, since I'm useless. Will let Kris fix the capital letters, and come back fresh tomorrow.

[kbjarkefur]

I think there was only one case!

[kbjarkefur]

I am ok with merging this now

[kbjarkefur]

Looks like this was committed without your suggestions @mariaruth. Is that ok?

[mariaruth]

better if we could add them, what's the best way to do that?

[kbjarkefur]

restore branch, add them and merge again.

I have restored the branch, and will add those that I think is straightforward and then comment on anyone I am not sure.