worldbank / iefieldkit

Stata commands designed for Impact Evaluations field work. These are tools that are used during/after a survey in the field for data quality monitoring.
MIT License
38 stars 18 forks source link

Checklist for releast of version 1.5 #148

Closed luizaandrade closed 4 years ago

luizaandrade commented 4 years ago

Version number and dates in ado-files and help files.

The version number is on the format number.number where the first number is incremented if it is a major release. If the first number is incremented the second number is reset to 0. If it is not a major release, then the first number is left unchanged and the second number is incremented.

Version number and date in ado-file. Change both version number and date. Make sure that this line is the very first line in the ado-file:

*! version 5.4 15DEC2017  DIME Analytics dimeanalytics@worldbank.org

    capture program drop iefieldkit
    program iefieldkit

Date at the top of the help file. Change only the date, there is no version number in the help file.

{smcl}
{* 15 Dec 2017}{...}
{hline}
help for {hi:iefieldkit}
{hline}
luizaandrade commented 4 years ago

All done!

kbjarkefur commented 4 years ago

I want to add "re-base existing branches and write in check-list issue which branches were successfully re-based and which were not".

Re-base after v1.5:

Branches that fails to re-base starts to be so out of data that they might be gnarly to merge towards master.

kbjarkefur commented 4 years ago

No action required on the failed re-bases, but if I saw a branch that was mine that could be deleted in failures, then now would be a good time to do that. And if I saw one that I intend to work on, then I would try to solve this before it gets worse @bbdaniels and @luizaandrade

luizaandrade commented 4 years ago

I think that makes sense. I also added an item to update the command from SSC and make sure it's the last version once we get the email from Kit Baum

luizaandrade commented 4 years ago

I think we can close the branch on #100, since we decided not to implement it.

kbjarkefur commented 4 years ago

ok, I saw you deleted it now. thanks!