Closed umranyaman closed 2 years ago
Hi @umranyaman ,
I may not understand your question. dPSI is certainly influenced by T values relative to N values. I am doing a PSI-Sigma workshop in early December for about 10 friends (people from splicing field). Would you like to join? If you do, please send me an email to klin@cshl.edu.
The “Ex” means extra splicing events that not included in the gtf file. In other words, the events are novel to the gene annotation.
Best, Woody
Thanks very much, I'd definitely join, I sent you an e-mail about it.
So when I apply threshold for "significant" splicing events it is P<0.05 AND |dPSI|>5. For the events with lower T values, I got significant P values but |dPSI|<5 since their T/N smaller due to their T values. For most of the important genes I have low T values in each sample, are the supporting reads(of splice junctions) values dependent on the exon numbers of a gene? Should I reconsider those events as significant or not?
Best, Umran
Hi @wososa,
Hope you are well. I need your opinion for the alternative splicing events where the T in values are small. Do you think lower T values would cause dPSI getting smaller, but however significant(as their P values are <0.05) to the events where T values are big enough (e.g. >50)? I just realised that dPSI values are not in the range (-5 to +5) for small T values anyway, however P values are <0.05. Do you think this is somehow linked to exon number that gene contains, or the Isoforms diversity of some genes is the reason T values getting bigger, so the dPSI is getting bigger.
So in summary, do you think there should be even lower threshold for dPSI depending on the T values to make it more significant compared to Isoforms with higher T values?
Also I would like to ask the what's the meaning of EX of the alternative splicing event EX.TSS please?
Thanks very much, Best, Umran