Open wowsiddanth opened 2 years ago
As stated in CS2103T website, omitting merge node (diamond) is an acceptable simplification. It also does not cause ambiguities as a join node should have a fork node complementing it and both lines should be bolded according to UML standards but in this case, it clearly is not. This is just a line joining the alt paths together.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Steps to reproduce: Implementation -> Adding Date/Time to Tasks
This is a violation of UML, and thus, a Low severity.
Expected: Diamond present or paths merge into one when the alt paths remerge.
Actual: Horizontal line, which looks like a join node which is used for parallel paths, and thus inappropriate.
Screenshots: