I tried to keep things civil, but you know how it gets over there...
Anyway, to keep them happy, maybe it's worthwhile to include an explicit copy of PuTTY's license in the /lib/sshzlib/ folder, since PuTTY's developers are sloppy about including copyright and licensing details in each source file.
(Thanks again for sharing this project! I hope to test it on parsing ORA files in the near future...)
The ever-paranoid users at vbforums have raised concerns about PuTTY's licensing model as used in this project:
http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?848511-Is-there-a-way-to-work-around-the-Resource-Editor
I tried to keep things civil, but you know how it gets over there...
Anyway, to keep them happy, maybe it's worthwhile to include an explicit copy of PuTTY's license in the /lib/sshzlib/ folder, since PuTTY's developers are sloppy about including copyright and licensing details in each source file.
(Thanks again for sharing this project! I hope to test it on parsing ORA files in the near future...)