Closed dselivanov closed 6 years ago
What issues are you referring to?
I originally decided against something like that because strictly speaking, an int
and a float
are not guaranteed to be the same size. I suppose I could configure test. The other advantage to this approach is that it's pretty easy to create a no-copy-on-modify interface.
I don't think it would be too hard to modify what's already there to operate on ints instead. I'll play around with it this evening.
Minor issue when small objects have storage overhead due to usage of xptr.
Unfortunately the storage overhead is mostly from the S4 object, which is necessary for the multiple dispatch. It definitely makes serializing easier though.
I've started the conversion in this branch. There were a few representation problems I had to think about for a bit longer than I expected. But I've converted over binary arithmetic operations, which I think will be the hardest. So the rest is just making some minor changes. I'll try to finish the conversion this weekend.
Implemented in latest.
Cool! Will try it out tomorrow.
18 окт. 2017 г. 21:01 пользователь "Drew Schmidt" notifications@github.com написал:
Implemented in latest.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/wrathematics/float/issues/5#issuecomment-337658243, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE4u3SBywe8tnLZI4SGgjl7RAVbHfpaCks5sti7MgaJpZM4Pz5Zd .
Sorry haven't had a chance to check today. Will be traveling next 2 weeks, so will take a look and leave feedback after returning.
18 окт. 2017 г. 21:09 пользователь "Dmitriy Selivanov" < selivanov.dmitriy@gmail.com> написал:
Cool! Will try it out tomorrow.
18 окт. 2017 г. 21:01 пользователь "Drew Schmidt" < notifications@github.com> написал:
Implemented in latest.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/wrathematics/float/issues/5#issuecomment-337658243, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE4u3SBywe8tnLZI4SGgjl7RAVbHfpaCks5sti7MgaJpZM4Pz5Zd .
No worries. I'd definitely appreciate any feedback you have whenever you get a chance.
Works amazingly! Also I believe now it is much simpler to create Rcpp
extensions. Excellent work, thank you very much.
Thanks! Yes, long-term I'd like to create (or see someone else create) an RcppArmadillo counterpart that uses the fmat
/ Mat<float>
interface. There's a package vignette now that describes the things a developer might need to know about the package. Hopefully it's useful.
Don't you think that approach taken by
bit64
package can be useful forfloat
? Similarly we can storefloat32
as R'sint
but with additional attribute. This will allow to overcome some issues you described in readme. Also it will allow to easily serialize/deserialize objects..