wri / gfw-raster-analysis-lambda

GFW Raster Analysis in AWS Lambda
8 stars 4 forks source link

Fix batchgetitem bug #53

Closed solomon-negusse closed 3 years ago

solomon-negusse commented 3 years ago

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces: - [X] Bugfix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming) - [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes) - [ ] Build related changes - [ ] Documentation content changes - [ ] Other (please describe): ## What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Other information

codecov[bot] commented 3 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #53 (91a96a4) into develop (cffb583) will increase coverage by 0.11%. The diff coverage is 86.36%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #53      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    91.57%   91.69%   +0.11%     
===========================================
  Files           20       20              
  Lines         1140     1156      +16     
===========================================
+ Hits          1044     1060      +16     
  Misses          96       96              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.69% <86.36%> (+0.11%) :arrow_up:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
raster_analysis/results_store.py 94.05% <78.57%> (+0.51%) :arrow_up:
raster_analysis/globals.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
tests/e2e/test_raster_analysis.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update cffb583...91a96a4. Read the comment docs.