Merge changes (Python, package upgrades) up to production

dmannarino commented 12 months ago

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

[ ] Make sure you are requesting to pull a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side). Don't request your master!
[ ] Make sure you are making a pull request against the develop branch (left side). Also you should start your branch off our develop.
[ ] Check the commit's or even all commits' message styles matches our requested structure.
[ ] Check your code additions will fail neither code linting checks nor unit test.

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces: - [ ] Bugfix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming) - [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes) - [ ] Build related changes - [ ] Documentation content changes - [ ] Other (please describe): ## What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

-

Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

Other information

codecov-commenter commented 12 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (6c67284) 94.85% compared to head (a8d5ed1) 94.52%. Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
raster_analysis/data_environment.py	84.61%	2 Missing :warning:
raster_analysis/query.py	93.54%	2 Missing :warning:
raster_analysis/tiling.py	83.33%	1 Missing :warning:
raster_analysis/window.py	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #79 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 94.85% 94.52% -0.33% ========================================== Files 19 19 Lines 1244 1261 +17 ========================================== + Hits 1180 1192 +12 - Misses 64 69 +5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/wri/gfw-raster-analysis-lambda/pull/79/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/wri/gfw-raster-analysis-lambda/pull/79/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri) | `94.52% <88.88%> (-0.33%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

dmannarino commented 9 months ago

Encountering this issue in staging, going to delay merging until I institute a workaround: https://github.com/lambgeo/docker-lambda/issues/56

wri / gfw-raster-analysis-lambda